Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Donaldson v. District Court for the City & County of Denver

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 22, 1993No. 92SA371PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kirshbaum

In this original proceeding filed pursuant to C.A.R. 21, the petitioner, Freddie B. Donaldson, seeks an order prohibiting the respondent, the District Court in and for the City and County of Denver, from authorizing the administration of the antipsy-chotic drug prolixin1 to the petitioner. Having issued a rule to show cause why the requested relief should not be granted, we now discharge the rule.

I

The petitioner is charged with offenses in two criminal proceedings, one pending in the District Court for Arapahoe County, Colorado, and the other pending in the respondent District Court for the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Riggins v. NevadaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Schloendorff v. Society of the New York HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. People v. MedinaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  4. Goedecke v. State, Dept. of InstitutionsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  5. Halaby, McCrea & Cross v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. People v. TallyColorado Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. People ex rel. MarquardtColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Donaldson v. District Court for the City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API