Legal Opinion

Schlein v. Gairoard

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 20, 1941PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

Save as presently stated, the judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the memorandum delivered by Circuit Court Judge Ackerson.

In reaching the stated result, we do not, under the circumstances exhibited, find it necessary to express, and we do not express, any opinion as to whether respondent did or did not have the right to pay the full purchase price ($25,000) for the stock at any time he elected without waiting to pay it, as provided, in installments, or whether respondent did or did not have the right (had he asserted it) to accelerate the payment…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Brunswick Hills Racquet Club, Inc. v. Route 18 Shopping Center AssociatesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  2. Countryside Orthopaedics, P.C. v. PeytonSupreme Court of Virginia · 2001
  3. Warner Bros. Pictures v. BrodelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Schlossman's, Inc. v. RadcliffeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  5. Berg Metals Corp. v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API