Legal Opinion
Zahno v. Urquart
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 17, 1995PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs, motion denied, third-party complaint reinstated and cross motion granted. Memorandum: Plaintiff, a mechanic employed by third-party defendant, Modern Landfill, Inc. (Modern Landfill), was injured on the job
*1005while repairing a bulldozer owned by defendant Urquart Contracting (Urquart). The bulldozer was temporarily in the possession of defendant third-party plaintiff R & S Leasing and Equipment Sales, Inc. (R & S) and was being used by Modern Landfill at its Lewiston, New York, site. Plaintiff commenced a negligence action against Urquart and R…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dole v. Dow Chemical Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
- North Star Reinsurance Corp. v. Continental InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- State v. U.W. Marx, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Meraner v. Albany Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3Cited by4 opinions
- LaSalle National Bank v. Massachusetts Bay InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
- Franklin v. Stillwater Hydro Partners, L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Arlet, R., Aplt. v. WCAB (L&I)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
- Durandette v. City of Syracuse Fire DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997