Legal Opinion

Cessna v. Benedict

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 26, 1901PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Bill in Chancery. — Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Richard S. Tuthill, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1900.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

This is an appeal from a chancery decree. The principal objections seem to be, first, that the evidence did not warrant the finding that the transactions between appellant Cessna and appellee, were in the nature of an open account, upon which appellee charged and received usurious interest, and the finding that the entire debt had been in fact paid; second, that there was a demurrer still pending and undisposed of when the cause was referred to the master and when the final decree was entered; third, that the decree includes in the judgment for costs the fees of the master and his…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ditch v. SennottIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Taylor v. WrightIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Jesse French Piano & Organ Co. v. MeehanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1898
  4. Lang v. MaxAppellate Court of Illinois · 1893

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. SchwallAppellate Court of Illinois · 1903
  2. Haagen v. Globe Printing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1906
  3. Barker v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API