Legal Opinion

Hude v. Vannest

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 4, 1977No. Docket No. 29039Published

1Opinion of the CourtR. M. Maher, P. J.

Plaintiff brought this action against defendant under the Paternity Act, MCLA 722.711 et seq.; MSA 25.491 et seq. At the close of plaintiff’s proofs, the court directed a verdict for defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff presented the following testimony at trial. She was an unmarried woman on August 18,

1972, when she had intercourse with defendant on the ball field of the Gladwin County Fairgrounds. She remained unmarried on June 20, 1973, when she gave birth to Bradley Robert Hude. She dated no other men nor engaged in any other act of sexual intercourse during the possible period of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. CaseMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Boudinier v. BoudinierMissouri Court of Appeals · 1947
  3. Pierson v. PiersonWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Magarell v. MagarellMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Kuhns v. OlsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API