Straughter v. Safety Savings & Loan Assn.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWood, P. J.
After a demurrer of defendant Safety Savings and Loan Association, and defendant Woods, to the first amended complaint had been sustained on all the grounds specified in the demurrer, plaintiff did not file an amended complaint within the time allowed for amending, and an order of dismissal was entered as to said defendants. Plaintiff appeals from the order.
Appellant contends that the first amended complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action and that the allegations therein are not uncertain or ambiguous.
The allegations of the first amended complaint are in substance, as…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Franklin v. HansenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Hancock v. BurnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Vaughn v. Certified Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Hege v. Worthington, Park & WorthingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Jones v. American President Lines, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Zumbrun v. University of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Oakes v. EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1969
- Gonzales v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Greenberg v. Hollywood Turf ClubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Mitchell v. National Automobile & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.