Saar v. Fuller
Supreme Court of Iowa
Afjpeal from Mills Oirouit Gourt. Plaintiff instituted an action at law on a money demand, and sued out a writ of attachment, which was levied on cer tain personal property as the property of the defendant John Finkin. Thomas J. Finkin filed a petition of intervention, claiming to be the owner of the attached property, and asking that the same be released from the levy.
Read the full summary
Afjpeal from Mills Oirouit Gourt. Plaintiff instituted an action at law on a money demand, and sued out a writ of attachment, which was levied on cer tain personal property as the property of the defendant John Finkin. Thomas J. Finkin filed a petition of intervention, claiming to be the owner of the attached property, and asking that the same be released from the levy. Plaintiff answered this petition, denying that intervenor was the owner of the property, and alleging that his only claim thereto was based on a pretended sale by defendant John Finkin, and that such sale was made for the…
1Opinion of the CourtReed, J.
1. INSTRUCTIONS : submitting questions o£ doubtful proof. I. Intervenor is the son of defendant John Finkin. At the time of the alleged sale of the property to him, he was about twenty-eight years old. He had lived in his father’s family continuously since he-attained his majority, and had rendered service for him during all that time, and had been boarded and clothed and treated in other respects as a *426member of the family. He and his father testified that soon after he became twenty-one years old, an agreement was entered into between them that he should continue to work for his father until…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Hatheway v. HansonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
- Ward v. AtkinsonColorado Court of Appeals · 1912
- Hutton v. DoxseeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
- Madden v. Saylor Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- George Enger & Co. v. LoflandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.