Legal Opinion

Edwin C. Price Co. v. Ruggles & Rademaker Salt Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 3, 1936No. Gen. No. 38,462Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

Edwin C. Price Company, a corporation, brought suit against the defendant, Ruggles & Rademaker Salt Company, a corporation, to recover commissions claimed to have been earned by plaintiff in procuring two contracts for the defendant for the sale of salt by defendant, one to Armour & Co., and the other to Swift & Co. Plaintiff’s claim seems to be based upon ■ an oral contract entered into by it and defendant whereby defendant agreed to pay plaintiff for procuring the two contracts. Defendant denied it had entered into any such contract with plaintiff and denied plaintiff had procured the two…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. WeideSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Glassberg v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  3. Barney v. FullerNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Dodge v. . WeillNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  5. Cochrane v. West Duluth Industrial Construction & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API