Legal Opinion

In re Schuyler

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1900PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Application for an order revoking and cancelling a liquor tax certificate.

1Opinion of the CourtO’Gorman, J.

The evidence clearly establishes the violation alleged in the petition. The respondent, however, resists the application to cancel the certificate on two grounds—first, that the license has expired since the commencement of this proceeding; and, secondly, that on a criminal prosecution based on the acts constituting the violation in question the respondent was discharged. ¡Neither ground is tenable. The right to a cancellation, where the evidence warrants it, existed at the date of the institution of the proceeding and cannot be impaired by the subsequent expiration of the license. Matter of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re LymanNew York Supreme Court · 1899
  2. In re LymanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Trappers Lake Lodge & Resort, LLC v. Colorado Department of RevenueColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Farley v. BarrickNew York Supreme Court · 1914
  3. TRAPPERS LAKE LODGE & RES. v. Dept. of Rev.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API