Legal Opinion

Tanski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 12, 1986No. Appeal, No. 3248 C.D. 1984PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Craig,

Thomas Tanski appeals from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board which affirmed a referee’s decision dismissing Tanski’s petition for reinstatement. We affirm.

Tanski was employed by DeBaldo Brothers, Inc. from 1969 to 1979 as a heavy equipment operator. From October 6, 1976 to December 20, 1976, Tanski did not work because his physician advised him to avoid any further exposure to work-generated stress and prescribed a major tranquilizer. Thereafter, Tan-ski filed a claim petition alleging that the stress injury was work-related. After a hearing, a referee…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. Township of McCandlessCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Memorial Osteopathic Hospital v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Lehigh Valley Coal Sales Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. DeBaldo Bros. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hartner v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. FR&S, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Preston v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API