Legal Opinion
Amox v. BARGE ATB 99
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided June 28, 1984No. A83-001 CIVPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VON DER HEYDT, Chief Judge.
THIS CAUSE comes before the court on defendant Sea-Land Freight Service, Inc.’s (Sea-Land) motion for summary judgment. This court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1333(1) and 33 U.S.C. § 905(b).
Plaintiff’s request for oral argument was untimely and furthermore is denied under the local rule in order to expedite the business of the court.
I. Plaintiff’s Claim
Plaintiff alleges that the barge ATB 99 1 was owned by defendant Crowley Maritime Corporation (Crowley) and was under charter to Sea-Land. Further, plaintiff claims that the defendant…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Reed v. the YakaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. PfeiferSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Antonio Napoli v. (Transpacific Carriers Corp. And Universal Cargo Carriers, Inc.) Hellenic Lines, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Jackson v. Lykes Bros. Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Ron Tonkin Gran Turismo, Inc. v. Fiat Distributors, Inc., and Wakehouse Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kerr-McGee Corp. v. Ma-Ju Marine Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Kerr-Mcgee Corporation v. Ma-Ju Marine Services, Inc., Dorothy E. Lyons, Cross-Appellant v. Kerr-Mcgee Corporation, Defendant-Third Party Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. Ma-Ju Marine Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987