Legal Opinion
Weinstock v. Citibank, N. A.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 10, 2001PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for fraud, the defendant Citibank, N. A., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Barron, J.), dated January 5, 2001, which denied its motion to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it.
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellant, and the action against the remaining defendants is severed.
The appellant obtained a default judgment against the respondent in a prior foreclosure action. The respondent then commenced…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- European American Bank & Trust Co. v. SerotaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Laurenzano v. LaurenzanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Mitchell v. Insurance of North AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- Tomasello Bros. v. FriedmanNew York Supreme Court · 1968
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mazzei v. KyriacouAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Matter of B.Z. Chiropractic, P.C. v. Allstate Ins. Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- IndyMac Bank, F.S.B. v. VincoliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Hartloff v. HartloffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Campbell v. Bank of America, N.A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.