Legal Opinion · Dissent

Chisholm v. Federal Communications Commission

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 12, 1976No. Nos. 75-1951, 75-1994Published

1DissentJ. Skelly Wright, Circuit Judge

In the recent past the Federal Communications Commission has repeatedly urged Congress to amend or repeal the “equal time” provision contained in Section 315 of the Communications Act.1 The Commis*19sion’s recommendation is based on its conclusion that Section 315, including the 1959 amendment, prevents the American people from receiving adequate broadcast coverage of political campaigns.2 Congress, however, has not acted.

There is no indication that Congress’ failure to act on the Commission’s recommendations with respect to Section 315 is an inadvertence. From the very beginning of broadcasting…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API