Legal Opinion

Louis v. Fortune Insurance Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 24, 1992No. 92-738Published

1Per curiam

We reverse the summary judgment for the insurance carrier, notwithstanding a settlement by the insured with a third party tortfeasor. There are triable issues of material fact in regard to the components of the negotiations resulting in the settlement, and also a doubt as to the sufficiency of the evidence to establish the threshold for recovery. Parker v. Bryce, 96 So.2d 154 (Fla.1957); Correia v. Seaboard Coast *105Line Railroad Company, 393 So.2d 1161 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Ritchey v. Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 361 So.2d 438 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978).

The cause is remanded to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Parker v. BryceSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  2. Ritchey v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  3. Correia v. Seaboard Coast Line RR Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API