Legal Opinion

Pitre v. Elliott

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 5, 1989No. 87-1389PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNOLL, Judge.

The issue on appeal is whether two automobile liability insurance policies, one which insured a truck-tractor and the other which insured the trailer (commonly referred to as an “eighteen wheeler” when coupled), contain conflicting excess insurance coverage provisions.

The codefendants, Old Republic Insurance Company (hereafter Old Republic), Ryder Truck Rentals, Inc. (hereafter Ryder), Latexco International, Inc. (hereafter Latexco), and Mark Elliot (sometimes referred to hereafter collectively as the code-fendants), appeal the motion for partial summary judgment granted in favor…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mays v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Hertz Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1978

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. LaFleur v. Aftco Enterprises, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2006
  2. Wanda Lafleur, Indiv. v. Aftco Enterprises, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API