Legal Opinion

People v. Breverman

California Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1998No. S058721PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

77 Cal.Rptr.2d 870 (1998)

960 P.2d 1094

19 Cal.4th 142

The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

Scott BREVERMAN, Defendant and Appellant.

No. S058721,

Supreme Court of California.

August 31, 1998.

Marcia A. Morrissey, Santa Monica, for Defendant and Appellant.

Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, George Williamson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Carol Wendelin Pollack, Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Jaime L. Fuster, Sharon Wooden Richard, William T. Harter and Margaret E. Maxwell, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

BAXTER, Justice.

Two young men who were walking…

Also in this document: Dissent · Mosk; Dissent · Kennard; Dissent · Brown.

2Cases cited94 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. BlackburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  2. People v. NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  3. People v. WeddingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. People v. GanaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. (HC) Oquita v. DiazDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API