Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Dozier

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 31, 1981Published

1DissentMain, J.

Main, J. (dissenting). I respectfully dissent. The history of and the need for change in the relevant statutes are well set forth in People v Dorsey (104 Misc 2d 963) and the Legislature clearly expressed its intent in the preamble of the amendment in which it was decreed that: “it is the legislature’s intention to modify the resistance requirement in the definition of forcible compulsion so that the victim need only offer so much resistance as is reasonable under the circumstances” (L 1977, ch 692, § 1; emphasis added). Subdivision 8 of section 130.00 of the Penal Law, as amended, in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. ColemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. People v. YannucciNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  3. People v. BercumeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
  4. People v. DorseyNew York Supreme Court · 1980
  5. People v. YanikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API