Legal Opinion
Chosick v. Reilly
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 19, 1954No. Civ. 16019PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.
This is an appeal from a judgment denying a writ of mandate in proceedings under section 1094.5, Code of Civil Procedure, to review an order of the State Board of Equalization revoking appellants’ on-sale general liquor license.
The controversy herein relates to the third count only of the amended accusation inaugurating the administrative proceedings, which count in substance charged violation of section 303, Penal Code, by employing “B girls” upon appellants’ licensed premises for the purpose of procuring or encouraging purchase or sale of alcoholic beverages and by paying those girls…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Covert v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- English v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Hohreiter v. GarrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Cooper v. State Board of Public HealthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
3Cited by22 opinions
- Griggs v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- State v. OgataIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
- Howitt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Rudolph v. Athletic CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- In re Marín BáezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1959
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.