Legal Opinion

National Hudson River Bank v. Reynolds

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1890PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, Columbia county.

1Opinion of the CourtLearned, P. J.

This is an action to foreclose a mortgage given by Lucy A. Reynolds, in 1883, to the plaintiff. It was given as security “for any and all indorsements' now made by the said Lucy A. Reynolds, or that she may hereafter make, of note or notes, or other paper of * * * R. Reynolds’ Son, * * * and which shall be owned or held by said National Hudson River Bank;” and “to be a lien and security to said amount for the payment of any and all notes, drafts, or engagements, indorsed by said Lucy A. Reynolds, now held by said bank, or which may hereafter be held and owned by said bank.” R. Reynolds’ Son…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pray v. . HegemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. Sheldon v. . HortonNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  3. Cady v. . BradshawNew York Court of Appeals · 1889

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. GridleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  2. Clarke v. StumpfAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  3. Martin v. WalkerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Lockport Exchange Trust Co. v. HydeNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  5. Clarke v. StumpfAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API