Legal Opinion
Daigle v. Vanderpool
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided June 27, 2003No. 2002 CA 2005PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
jjgCLAIBORNE, J.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff, Cecilia Daigle, from a judgment of the trial court in favor of the defendant, Marcia Vander-pool, finding that the lease éntered into between them on June 26, 1992, was valid only with regard to the primary term of ten years and that, at the expiration of the ten-year period on June 26, 2002, it was no longer valid. The judgment also decreed that Cecilia Daigle had no other right to remain on the premises owned by Marcia Vanderpool. The defendant has answered the appeal.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The property presently owned by Marcia…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Murray v. BarnhartSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
- Fontenot v. Marquette Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
- Arrow Trucking Co. v. Continental Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1985
- Hertz Equip. Rent. Corp. v. Homer Knost Const. Co., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
- Homer Nat. Bank v. Tri-District Dev. Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Monterrey Center, LLC v. Ed.ucation Partners, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2008
- M/V Resources LLC v. Louisiana Hardwood Products LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- Southern Treats v. Titan Properties, LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2006