People v. Johnson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GABBERT, J.
Following a non-jury trial, defendant Mark Allen Johnson was convicted of violating Penal Code section 187—committing second degree murder. Now appealing, Johnson alleges the trial court committed error by its rulings: (1) that he was duly advised, at all relevant times, of his constitutional rights; (2) that confessions and admissions given by *992him were not the product of improper inducement; and (3) that interrogations of him made while he was under the influence of sodium amytal, a truth drug, were admissible. Defendant asserts the above rulings are in error since the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Blackburn v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Davis v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- People v. DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- People v. BlairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. MickleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Cain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- People v. LawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- State v. RoweNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.