Legal Opinion

Fuselier v. State Market Commission

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided July 29, 1970No. 3147PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

En banc.

2Per curiam

In a previous appeal of this case, we, on our motion, found the State Bond and Building Commission is an indispensable party. We remanded the matter to the district court to permit the plaintiff to amend his petition to make the State Bond and Building Commission a party defendant, 231 So.2d 652. In compliance with our decree, the plaintiff amended his petition, joining the State Bond and Building Commission as a party defendant. The case is now before us on a second appeal.

The plaintiff is Harvey Fuselier, a taxpayer, elector and resident of the State of Louisiana. In his original…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Arata v. Louisiana Stadium and Exposition DistrictSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1969
  2. Carso v. Board of Liquidation of State DebtSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1944
  3. Branton v. ParkerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Fuselier v. State Market CommissionLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cardi Corp. v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1987
  2. Fuselier v. State Market CommissionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API