Legal Opinion

Adams v. Buhler

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1892No. 15,733PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From.the Adams Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.

This case is in this court for the second • time — Adams v. Buhler, 116 Ind. 100. It is now contended that the notice of an intention to hold a lien upon the real estate described is insufficient. Counsel say of the complaint : “ We incline to think that it fails to show a sufficient notice filed with the recorder to constitute a lien against appellants’ property, in that the notice having shown that the labor was performed for a contractor and not for the owner, we think it should have shown that the proper antecedent steps had been taken by notifying the appellants at or before the time of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Deming v. State ex rel. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Brown v. BuddIndiana Supreme Court · 1851
  3. Walter v. HartwigIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Adams v. BuhlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Wilson v. HopkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1875

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sinclair v. GunzenhauserIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Cline v. Indianapolis Mortar & Fuel Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. McCartin McAuliffe Mechanical Contractor, Inc. v. Midwest Gas Storage, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Adams v. ShafferIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Northwestern Loan & Investment Ass'n v. McPhersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API