Legal Opinion

Valladares v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 27, 1994PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Lippmann, J.), entered on or about June 11, 1993, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff’s complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Summary judgment was properly granted in light of defendant’s introduction of an easement agreement entered into between it and the owner of the stairway where plaintiff fell, together with affidavits from its own engineer, which indicate that defendant neither owned nor maintained the stairway in question. Plaintiff’s belated reliance upon Fortson v New York City Tr. Auth.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Recovery Consultants, Inc. v. Shih-HsiehAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  2. Fortson v. City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bingham v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Haberlin v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. O'Hara v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. Bingham v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API