Legal Opinion

Comer v. Himes

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1877PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Howard Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtNiblack, J.

The complaint represents that Isaac Himes, Lewis Himes; Samuel Himes, George W. Himes, Timothy L. Himes, Samuel Boyne, Jefferson Boyne and- Jacob Boyne, the appellees, at the'December term, 1872, of the court below, recovered a judgment against James Comer and Mary Comer, his wife, the appellants, for the recovery of, and quieting the title to, a certain tract of land in Howard county. See Comer v. Himes, 49 Ind. 482.

The complaint further represents, that the appellants, believing at the time that they had no valid defence to the action, suffered said judgment to be entered against them by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Comer v. HimesIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Owen v. CooperIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Davis v. PerryIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  4. McDade v. McDadeIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  5. Hardy v. ChipmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1876

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Michener v. Springfield Engine & Thresher Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Murphy v. BranamanIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Findling v. LewisIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Whitehall v. CrawfordIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Kiley v. MurphyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API