Legal Opinion

In re the Adoption of Goldman

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 24, 1977Published

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division (51 AD2d 282) is affirmed, with costs. That court correctly determined, upon the record before it, that the natural mother had not abandoned the child within the meaning of section 111 of the Domestic Relations Law in effect at the time this adoption proceeding was commenced or, as we think also, within the meaning of that section as amended by chapter 666 of the Laws of 1976 (see, e.g., Matter of Susan W. v Talbot G., 34 NY2d 76). The heavy burden of proving abandonment (Matter of Bistany, 239 NY 19; Matter of Cocozza v Antidormi, 35 AD2d 810)…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bennett v. JeffreysNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Matter of BistanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
  3. Susan W. v. Talbot G.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Cocozza v. AntidormiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  5. In re the Adoption of GoldmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API