Wittkamp v. United States
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
FREDERICK W. KAESS, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs, Charles and Nancy Wittkamp, filed suit against the United States and other defendants, claiming injuries suffered when a rechambered 30.06 Springfield Rifle exploded in Mr. Wittkamp’s face on November 11, 1966.
The following allegations against the United States were made by plaintiffs in their second amended complaint:
1. The rifle was defective per se, because of brittle metal;
2. The Government discovered the weapon was a hazard to the armed forces and disposed of it;
3. The Government failed to warn the general public of a known defective rifle;
' 4.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Piercefield v. Remington Arms Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Coates v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
- William E. Simpson, a Minor, Etc., William H. Simpson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
- Moyer v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Julia Ford and Joe Ford v. American Motors Corporation, the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Ford v. American Motors Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984