Legal Opinion

Wittkamp v. United States

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided June 13, 1972No. Civ. A. 30979PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FREDERICK W. KAESS, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs, Charles and Nancy Wittkamp, filed suit against the United States and other defendants, claiming injuries suffered when a rechambered 30.06 Springfield Rifle exploded in Mr. Wittkamp’s face on November 11, 1966.

The following allegations against the United States were made by plaintiffs in their second amended complaint:

1. The rifle was defective per se, because of brittle metal;

2. The Government discovered the weapon was a hazard to the armed forces and disposed of it;

3. The Government failed to warn the general public of a known defective rifle;

' 4.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Piercefield v. Remington Arms Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Coates v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
  4. William E. Simpson, a Minor, Etc., William H. Simpson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
  5. Moyer v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Julia Ford and Joe Ford v. American Motors Corporation, the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  2. Ford v. American Motors Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API