Legal Opinion

Steele v. Steele

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 28, 1982No. 422-81PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUnderwood, J.

The defendant appeals an order of the Rut-land Superior Court finding him in wilful contempt for his failure to comply with the provisions of a divorce decree. The original divorce decree, issued on April 6, 1981, and based upon a stipulation of the parties, required the defendant “to pay and to hold the plaintiff harmless in connection with” a variety of obligations. Among them was a $7,000 debt to the Proctor Trust Company. As a consequence of the defendant’s failure to pay this debt, foreclosure proceedings were initiated by the bank against plaintiff’s home.

In the proceedings below,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Emmons v. EmmonsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  2. Spabile v. HuntSupreme Court of Vermont · 1976
  3. Grant v. GrantSupreme Court of Vermont · 1978
  4. Marshall v. MarshallColorado Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Condosta v. CondostaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1976

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Dartmouth Savings Bank v. F.O.S. AssociatesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
  2. Hunt v. HuntSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
  3. Mayo v. MayoSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
  4. Viskup v. ViskupSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
  5. Murray v. J & B International Trucks, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API