Legal Opinion

Guzek v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 8, 2005No. A122851Published

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

Petitioner seeks judicial review of an order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision that deferred parole consideration for 24 months based on the board’s determination, pursuant to ORS 144.228, that petitioner remains dangerous. We write only to address petitioner’s assertion that the board erred because it did not have a sufficient written report prepared by “the executive officer of the Department of Corrections institution,” ORS 144.228(2)(b),1 when it made its determination. As explained below, we agree with petitioner and, therefore, remand the case to the board for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Jensen Racing, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Sweeney v. SMC Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  3. Smith v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API