Legal Opinion

Markoe v. Naiditch and Sons

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 24, 1975No. 44605PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Todd, Justice.

Defendant Jack Lehtinen appeals from an order denying his alternative motions for amended findings or a new trial. The district court ordered judgment for plaintiffs, J. Stuart Markoe and Richard Markoe, against, defendant Naiditch and Sons, and for Naiditch and Sons on their cross-claim against appellant in an action for rent and costs in connection with a month-to-month lease. We affirm.

Naiditch and Sons is a partnership engaged in the business of development and management of rental properties. From 1966 on, it rented, for the storage of furniture, the fourth floor of a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gruman v. Investors Diversified Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  2. Duffy v. Park Terrace Supper Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  3. Haycock v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  4. Haycock v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  5. King v. Durkee-Atwood Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Austin Hill Country Realty, Inc. v. Palisades Plaza, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Frenchtown Square Partnership v. Lemstone, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2003
  3. SHORTLAND v. LarsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Dodge v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  5. Twin City Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. CochraneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API