Legal Opinion

Schultz v. Busendorf

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1921PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action for damages for alleged breach of contract for sale of real estate.

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.

Busendorf, the defendant, was the owner of a farm of some forty acres, thirty of which laid on one side of a highway and ten on the opposite side. The farm was for sale. The plaintiff came to this farm, made an observation of the place, and on the next day came again and after a further observation and examination, verbally agreed to: buy the thirty acres, and paid $50 down. Subsequently, he wished to acquire the ten additional acres, and agreed to purchase the entire property for $14,000. This price included the personal property on the farm, saving and excepting certain specified things…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Schiffer v. . DietzNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Pryor v. . City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  3. More v. SmedburghNew York Court of Chancery · 1841
  4. Russell Hardware & Implement Manufacturing Co. v. Utica Drop Forge & Tool Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1909
  5. Tompkins v. . HyattNew York Court of Appeals · 1863

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ballard v. KnappNew York Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Badger v. Scobell Chemical Co.New York Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API