Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Smith

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 1, 1900PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Before Kl/ugh, J., Greenville, December, 1898, and Gary, J., November, 1899. Action by Nannie B. Morgan and Hardy Smith against Beauregard Smith, H. T. Stroud, executor of H. M. Smith, Piedmont Savings Company, and The Peoples Bank.

Read the full summary

Before Kl/ugh, J., Greenville, December, 1898, and Gary, J., November, 1899. Action by Nannie B. Morgan and Hardy Smith against Beauregard Smith, H. T. Stroud, executor of H. M. Smith, Piedmont Savings Company, and The Peoples Bank. Defendant Smith appeals from both Circuit decrees. cite: As to appeal from intermediate order: 13 S. C., 254; ' 44 S. C., 536; Code, 11; 28 S. C., 571; 32 S. C., 317; 36 S. C., 173. This action cannot be maintained, until condition precedent has been performed: 30 S. C., 305; 50 N. Y., 250; 38 A. R., 54.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Jones.

The object of this action was to enforce payment by the defendant, Beauregard Smith, of $600, which sum was alleged to be due and a charge upon certain real estate devised to the defendant under the will of Henry M. Smith, deceased. The master found against the plaintiffs; but on exceptions to the Circuit Court, - Judge Klugh, on December 10, 1898, reversed the master and decreed that two-thirds of the $600 named in the will is a charge upon the lands devised to defendant, and to be accounted for, subject to the findings of the master…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Walker v. McDonaldSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  2. McCoy v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1933
  3. Montgomery & Crawford, Inc. v. Arcadia MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
  4. Bodie v. Char. & West. Car. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
  5. Montgomery & Crawford, Inc. v. Arcadia MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API