Legal Opinion

United States v. Kestner

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided August 27, 2019No. 3:18-cv-01289Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) NO. 3:18-cv-01289 ) MICHAEL KESTNER, et al., ) JUDGE CAMPBELL ) MAGISTRATE JUDGE NEWBERN Defendants. ) ORDER Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for an Order that Its Pending False Claims Act Civil Action is Legally Excepted from the Automatic Stay in Bankruptcy. (Doc. No. 66). Defendants filed a Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 71), and Plaintiff filed a Reply. (Doc. No. 72). For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s Motion is GRANTED. I.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. BornsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Bentley v. Boyajian (In Re Bentley)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2001
  3. In Re Commonwealth Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  4. Dominic's Restaurant of Dayton v. Christie MantiaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  5. United States Ex Rel. Fullington v. Parkway Hospital, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API