Legal Opinion

Stephen M. Garrison v. Case Hoffman, et al.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided February 18, 2026No. 3:24-cv-01614Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION STEPHEN M. GARRISON, CASE NO. 3:24 CV 1614 Plaintiff, v. JUDGE JAMES R. KNEPP II CASE HOFFMAN, et al., Defendants. ORDER Currently pending before the Court in this

42 U.S.C. § 1983

action are pro se Plaintiff Stephen M. Garrison’s Motions for Court Appointed Counsel (Doc. 39) and Discovery (Doc. 40). Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Doc. 39) The relevant statute provides that, for an individual proceeding in forma pauperis as Plaintiff is, “[t]he court may request an attorney to represent any person unable…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Henry Lavado, Jr. v. Patrick W. KeohaneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  2. Schultz v. HansenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API