Edwards v. State

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

An inadvertence in the former opinion in this case necessitates that the opinion be corrected and extended.

The reason for this order is that in the former opinion the court dealt with an error as . therein stated, hut it has been brought to our attention that one of the patent errors dealt with in said opinion has been corrected by the trial court, as appeared in a different portion of the record, and this had not been drawn to our attention.

The appeal here is from a judgment of conviction for the offense of assault with intent to rob.

The conviction of the defendant…