In re the Arbitration between Electronic & Missile Facilities, Inc. & Curtis
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSidney A. Fine, J.
This motion for reargument is granted. It seems clear that counsel for respondent did note a special appearance at the time he requested an adjournment, for the purpose of making the motion required by section 237-a of the Civil Practice Act. There has been no general appearance by respondent, since the request for an adjournment was made as an incident to a special appearance and was promptly followed up by the motion to vacate service, pursuant to section 237-a of the Civil Practice Act, for lack of jurisdiction of the person of respondent. Where an adjournment is obtained as an incident to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Auten v. AutenNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- In Re the Arbitration Between Gantt & Felipe Y Carlos Hurtado & Cia., Ltda.New York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Thompson v. MundheimNew York Supreme Court · 1943
3Cited by3 opinions
- Findley v. Blinken (In Re Joint Eastern & Southern District Asbestos Litigation)District Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Matter of Ferrara S. P. A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- Fisher v. Brook Village West PartnershipMassachusetts Superior Court · 1996