Legal Opinion

McCaskill v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 31, 1996No. 95-2229PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Cleophus McCaskill seeks reversal of an order denying his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. We affirm the denial of relief as to all matters raised in the motion except the allegation that appellant advised his defense counsel of the identity of two witnesses, Cynthia Moore and Christopher Moore, who could identify the actual perpetrator of the offense of which appellant was convicted.1 Appellant alleges that defense counsel did not make an inquiry of these two witnesses and hence did not incorporate these witnesses into…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Harich v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Marrow v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  2. Urquhart v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API