Malafsky v. Becker
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
After the respondent herein had filed his notice of lien he did not, within one year, commence an action to foreclose the lien, secure an order continuing the lien, or become a party defendant in an action to enforce another hen. Accordingly, his lien expired under the terms of the applicable statutes. (Lien Law, §§ 17, 19.)
The order appealed from should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted.
Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
Order unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted. Settle…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Cook v. Carmen S. Pariso, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Jericho Jewish Center v. HibnerNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Bernardo v. Steelco, Division of Metropolitan Steel Industries, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1982
- Charkin v. Premises Known as 2204 New Haven AvenueNew York Supreme Court · 1943
- Leven Betts, Ltd. v. MackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.