Legal Opinion
Prudence Louise Schwarz v. SSA
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided August 30, 2017No. 16-cv-163-SMPublished
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Prudence Louise Schwarz, Claimant v. Case No. 16-cv-163-SM Opinion No.
2017 DNH 167
Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant O R D E R Pursuant to
42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3), claimant, Prudence Schwarz, moves to reverse or vacate the Acting Commissioner’s decision denying her applications for Disability Insurance Benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act and Supplemental Security Income Benefits under Title XVI. See
42 U.S.C. §§ 423, 1381-1383c (collectively, the “Act”). The Acting…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Barnhart v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.