Legal Opinion

Martinsen v. Camperlino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 2010PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Smith, J.

At issue in this appeal is the New York rule against perpetuities (EPTL 9-1.1 [b]), and the exception to it that is set forth in Metropolitan Transp. Auth. v Bruken Realty Corp. (67 NY2d 156 [1986]). This litigation arises from an agreement regarding the subject parcel of property between Marie-Louise Chase Tiffany, who was plaintiffs aunt and predecessor in interest, and defendant, who is a real estate developer. Tiffany owned* property consisting of the subject parcel and approximately 115 acres of undeveloped land surrounding the subject parcel. In a 1981…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Transportation Authority v. Bruken Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Wildenstein & Co. v. WallisNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Morrison v. PiperNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Adler v. SimpsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Martin v. SeeleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  2. Kozak v. PoradaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  3. Block 865 Lot 300, LLC v. BaioneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API