Legal Opinion

Masaru Sumida v. Fusao Yumen

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 27, 1971No. 26223, 26341Published

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES M. CARTER, Circuit Judge:

This case arises out of a dismissal of a Chap. XII petition for a real property arrangement. Two questions are presented: (1) where the debtors (appellants) withdraw the proposed real property arrangement but failed to submit a new or amended proposal before or at the meeting of creditors, is the bankruptcy referee required by Sec. 481 of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C. § 881, either to adjudicate the debtor a bankrupt or to dismiss the debtor petition; (2) when the referee’s dismissal of the debtor’s petition has been affirmed by the district court as authorized…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In the Matters of Webcor, Inc., an Illinois Corporation, Bankrupt, Webcor Sales Company, a New Jersey Corporation, BankruptCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
  2. Ingels v. BotelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
  3. Preas v. Kirkpatrick & BurksCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
  4. In the Matter of Ralph C. Mathewson, Debtor. Ralph C. MathewsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API