Legal Opinion

Okmulgee Motor Sales Co. Ex Rel. Vassaur v. Prentice

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 15, 1962No. 39543PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERRY, Justice.

The parties, who appear here in the same relative position as in the trial court, will be referred to herein as they appeared in said court.

Plaintiff sold defendants an automobile. The latter executed in plaintiff’s favor a promissory note for a portion of the purchase price which was secured by a chattel mortgage covering the automobile. Upon defendants’ failing to timely pay in accordance with the provisions of the note, plaintiff demanded of defendants possession of the automobile, which demand was complied with. After gaining possession of the automobile, plaintiff…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bailey v. BlockTexas Supreme Court · 1911
  2. J. I. Case Threshing MacHine Co. v. Copren Bros.California Court of Appeal · 1916
  3. Hayes v. PaceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  4. Bondurant v. BondurantIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Peck v. Fair Haven & Westville RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ramco Operating Co. v. GassettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  2. Ramco Operating Co. v. GassettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API