Legal Opinion

Singer v. Effler

Albany City Court

Decided March 15, 1896PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Demubbeb to an answer.

1Opinion of the CourtMeegan, J.

The plaintiff’s verified complaint. alleges that, between certain dates named, he sold and delivered to the defends ant goods, wares and merchandise, consisting of groceries, at the agreed price of $35.60, and .that the terms of sale were cash, and no part has been paid. The defendant filed an answer wherein he “ denies that he has any knowledge sufficient to form a belief that at the times, mentioned in his said complaint plaintiff sold and delivered' to defendant goods, wares and merchandise, consisting of the value and agreed price of $35.60.” The plaintiff demurred to this answer. ■ .

The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Marie v. . GarrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Bennett v. . Leeds Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1888
  3. Edwards v. LentNew York Supreme Court · 1852
  4. Clark v. DillonNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1882
  5. Macauley v. Bromell & Barkley Printing Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1884

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rochkind v. PerlmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  2. Horvath v. BrettschneiderNew York City Court · 1928
  3. Schwartz v. RibaudoAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API