Legal Opinion

Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Newman

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 6, 1932Published

1Opinion of the CourtSlack, J.

The plaintiff seeks to recover upon a written instrument of the tenor following:

Rutland, Vt.

“A Newman Feb. 17, 1930.

Dear Sir

Please pay Montgomery Ward Company ($800.00) Eight Hundred Dollars and charge to my account.

This is the second payment of plumbing and heating for three houses, 82-84 Killington Avenue. 15 Vernon Street.

C. W. Young.”

The defendant had a verdict and judgment below, and the case is here on plaintiff’s exceptions.

The defendant never accepted the instrument in writing, and claims that consequently he is not liable. He relies in the first place upon the provision of G. L.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hall v. CordellSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Clifford v. West Hartford Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1931
  3. Pocket v. AlmonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1916
  4. Westberg v. Chicago Lumber & Coal Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Clay-Butler Lumber Co. v. W. H. Pickering Lumber Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1925

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API