Houchen v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BARTEAU, Judge.
Sterling Houchen appeals his conviction of child molesting, a Class C felony. 1 Because a prosecution witness improperly and deliberately informed the jury that Houchen had been offered a polygraph examination, we must reverse the conviction.
FACTS
Connie Houchen, appellant Sterling Hou-chen's wife, operated a home day care center in Frankfort, Indiana In June of 1991, A.M., a four-year-old girl for whom Connie provided day care, accused Sterling Houchen of molesting her. Detective Toney of the Frankfort police department interrogated Houchen at the police station in the late…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Davis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Chandler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Gipson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
- Goolsby v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1987
- Baker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sherwood v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
- Myers v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Lay v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- Vega v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- Kevin Speer v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.