Willman v. Riceland Foods, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WM. R. WILSON, JR., District Judge.
Pending is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand. 1 Separate Defendant Bayer Crop-Science LP (“Bayer”) responded. 2
This is an action for property and economic loss caused by alleged negligence of all Defendants and fraud on the part of separate Defendant Riceland Foods, Inc. (“Riceland”).
Bayer removed 3 this action on the basis of diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, and alleged that Riceland is an improper defendant. Riceland did not join in the removal. 4
Plaintiffs seek remand of this action under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) because complete diversity of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Wilson v. Republic Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Santor v. a & M KARAGHEUSIAN, INC.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- In Re Business Men's Assurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Transit Casualty Company v. Certain Underwriters At Lloyd's Of LondonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Sierra Club v. United States Army Corps of Engineers Federal Emergency Management AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.