Legal Opinion

Willman v. Riceland Foods, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided October 9, 2007No. 4:07CV00488-WRWPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

WM. R. WILSON, JR., District Judge.

Pending is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand. 1 Separate Defendant Bayer Crop-Science LP (“Bayer”) responded. 2

This is an action for property and economic loss caused by alleged negligence of all Defendants and fraud on the part of separate Defendant Riceland Foods, Inc. (“Riceland”).

Bayer removed 3 this action on the basis of diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, and alleged that Riceland is an improper defendant. Riceland did not join in the removal. 4

Plaintiffs seek remand of this action under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) because complete diversity of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Republic Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Santor v. a & M KARAGHEUSIAN, INC.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  3. In Re Business Men's Assurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  4. Transit Casualty Company v. Certain Underwriters At Lloyd's Of LondonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  5. Sierra Club v. United States Army Corps of Engineers Federal Emergency Management AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API