Legal Opinion

Staton v. Moody

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 16, 1952No. 34534, 34527PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

These two causes, No. 34534 and No. 34527, stem from a dispute as to the legal and proper disposition of the estate of Elizabeth Decker, deceased. No. 34527 was brought in the district court of Oklahoma county by Bernice Opal Moody, administratrix, with the will annexed, of the estate of Elizabeth Decker et al. against Loreta Staton, as administratrix of the estate of Anna Maude White, also known as Maude White et al.

Plaintiffs alleged that Loreta Staton was the administratrix of the estate of Anna Maude White and that the other defendants, Loreta Staton, Edwina Mc-Curtain, W. E. White,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Olcott v. BynumSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Nelson v. SchoonoverSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  3. Leahy v. CheneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  4. Torgerson v. HaugeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Dudley v. DudleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Catron v. First National Bank & Trust Co. of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  2. Boatright v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  3. Wadsworth v. CourtneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  4. Brown v. BivingsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  5. Crane v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API