Legal Opinion

Nail v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided November 9, 1932No. Docket No. 53044Published

1. Where the fee owner of real estate in Texas disposes of interests in oil and gas underlying her lands, retaining to herself an undivided fractional interest therein, held, such retained interest is property and subject to conveyance or transfer.

Read the full summary

1. Where the fee owner of real estate in Texas disposes of interests in oil and gas underlying her lands, retaining to herself an undivided fractional interest therein, held, such retained interest is property and subject to conveyance or transfer. Held, further, after conveyance or transfer of such property the income arising therefrom belongs to the new owner, the transferee, and is not taxable to transferor. 2. Fees paid attorneys for services rendered in defending against adverse claims respecting boundaries of lands, where no enlargement, or change of owner's existing rights is effected,…

1Opinion of the Court

R. E. NAIL AND GEORGE THOMPSON, JR., INDEPENDENT EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF M.M. (MRS. W. I.) COOK, DECEASED, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Nail v. Commissioner

Docket No. 53044.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

27 B.T.A. 33; 1932 BTA LEXIS 1137;

November 9, 1932, Promulgated

1. Where the fee owner of real estate in Texas disposes of interests in oil and gas underlying her lands, retaining to herself an undivided fractional interest therein, held, such retained interest is property and subject to conveyance or transfer. Held, further, after conveyance or transfer of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Nail v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API