Legal Opinion

Bower v. Morden

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 1994No. 21082PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MeDEVITT, Chief Justice.

In this case we are asked to decide if the right to judicial disqualification without cause under I.C.R. 25(a) may be limited due to the number of cases in which a party exercises the right against an individual judge. We hold that it may not, and that in this case the writs of prohibition and mandate are available as remedies to enforce the right.

Plaintiff - Appellant - Cross - Respondent, Greg H. Bower, Ada County Prosecuting Attorney (Bower), appeals from a district court ruling denying his request for a writ of mandate and writ of prohibition to prevent…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BearshieldIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Bopp v. City of SandpointIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. SchafferIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Price v. FeatherstoneIdaho Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Hultner-Wallner v. FeatherstoneIdaho Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bergeron Ex Rel. Perez v. O'NEILCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  2. State v. District CourtIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Bergeron Ex Rel. Perez v. O'NEILCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  4. Bower v. MordenIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Hepworth Holzer, LLP v. Fourth Judicial DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API