Legal Opinion
Crisel v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 18, 1990No. 89-00016PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
561 So.2d 453 (1990)
Michael CRISEL, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 89-00016.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
May 18, 1990.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and Allyn Giambalvo, Asst. Public Defender, Clearwater, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Peggy A. Quince, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
2Per curiam
Following our recent decision in V.A.A. v. State, 561 So.2d 314 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990), we reverse the trial court's denial of appellant's motion to dismiss the charges of possession of cocaine and marijuana, and direct that…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
3Cases cited10 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Carawan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
- Gordon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- Daudt v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- Singleton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Holmes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- State v. CriselSupreme Court of Florida · 1991